Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::open($save_path, $name) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::open(string $path, string $name): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::close() should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::close(): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::read($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::read(string $id): string|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::write($session_id, $session_data) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::write(string $id, string $data): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::destroy($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::destroy(string $id): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::gc($maxlifetime) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::gc(int $max_lifetime): int|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/franchi4/public_html/legal/system/core/Exceptions.php:271)
Trademark application are by and large protested, if your application contains any of grounds as recommended under area 9 and segment 11 of Trade Mark Act, 1999. These couple segments manage outright and relative grounds based on which an exchange check application can be questioned.
How about we comprehend these grounds piece by piece which are as per the following:
Total GROUNDS (SECTION 9):
Those imprints which are without any particular character.
Exchange marks which may serve in exchange to assign the kind, quality, values or different attributes of the products and ventures being referred to;
Check is of the nature to bamboozle or make perplexity;
Check contains or comprises of any issue which prone to hurt the religious of any class of nationals; or
In conclusion, its utilization is precluded under the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950.
RELATIVE GROUNDS (SECTION 11):
Area 11 sets out that a check should not be enlisted if there are conceivable motivations to cause perplexity among the general population incorporating probability of relationship with a prior exchange stamp.
An exchange stamp might likewise not be enlisted if its utilization in India is obligated to be averted by uprightness of any law of going off securing an unregistered exchange check utilized as a part of the reason for exchange or its utilization in India is at risk to be counteracted by goodness of Law of copyright.
Other than the reasons refered to above, components of uniqueness dependably remains the best measure for registrability of a check as an exchange stamp.
The term uniqueness needs to capture in connection to exchange check, not in separation. Peculiarity must be comprehended as 'some quality' in the exchange stamp which reserves the merchandise so set apart as particular from those of alternate items.
Peculiarity might be:
Characteristic; or
Procured over some undefined time frame.
The exchange check depends on the rule that one great can have just a single inception, similarly as one man has one mother; it implies that client effortlessly ready to recognize the items from that of contenders.
